Characterising the types of paediatric adverse events detected by the global trigger tool – CareTrack Kids

Author:

Hibbert Peter D123ORCID,Runciman William B123,Carson-Stevens Andrew4,Lachman Peter5,Wheaton Gavin6,Hallahan Andrew R7,Jaffe Adam89,White Les18,Muething Stephen10,Wiles Louise K123,Molloy Charlotte J123,Deakin Anita3,Braithwaite Jeffrey1

Affiliation:

1. Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia

2. Australian Centre for Precision Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

3. South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia

4. Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

5. International Society for Quality in Health Care, Dublin, Ireland

6. Division of Paediatric Medicine, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, North Adelaide, Australia

7. Children’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Australia

8. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

9. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney Children’s Hospital Network, Randwick, Australia

10. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, USA

Abstract

IntroductionA common method of learning about adverse events (AEs) is by reviewing medical records using the global trigger tool (GTT). However, these studies generally report rates of harm. The aim of this study is to characterise paediatric AEs detected by the GTT using descriptive and qualitative approaches.MethodsMedical records of children aged 0–15 were reviewed for presence of harm using the GTT. Records from 2012–2013 were sampled from hospital inpatients, emergency departments, general practice and specialist paediatric practices in three Australian states. Nurses undertook a review of each record and if an AE was suspected a doctor performed a verification review of a summary created by the nurse. A qualitative content analysis was undertaken on the summary of verified AEs.ResultsA total of 232 AEs were detected from 6,689 records reviewed. Over four-fifths of the AEs (193/232, 83%) resulted in minor harm to the patient. Nearly half (112/232, 48%) related to medication/intravenous (IV) fluids. Of these, 83% (93/112) were adverse drug reactions. Problems with medical devices/equipment were the next most frequent with nearly two-thirds (32/51, 63%) of these related to intravenous devices. Problems associated with clinical processes/procedures comprise one in six AEs (38/232, 16%), of which diagnostic problems (12/38, 32%) and procedural complications (11/38, 29%) were the most frequent.ConclusionAdverse drug reactions and issues with IVs are frequently identified AEs reflecting their common use in paediatrics. The qualitative approach taken in this study allowed AE types to be characterised, which is a prerequisite for developing and prioritising improvements in practice.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3