Medical accidents: A Socratic resolution?

Author:

Feeny Charles1,Baker Gus2,Irving Sam1

Affiliation:

1. Complete Counsel Ltd, Liverpool, UK

2. Clinical Neuropsychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Abstract

Whilst medical accidents and adverse events clearly have to be the subject of response and redress for individuals who have suffered injury, the current approach to such accidents and events has developed in a piecemeal way. We argue that the various processes involved in such response and redress are outmoded and there is a lack of a clear overview, in particular in terms of promoting better clinical management and less psychological impact on the victim. The current effect of clinical negligence litigation produces adverse outcomes in terms of a patient's safety and the psychological wellbeing of victims. The time has come for an overall approach to be considered, which we suggest should be holistic and which would result in positive outcomes for the NHS and its patients.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3