Evaluation of patient relatives’ opinions on physical restraint

Author:

Özdemir Ömer Fahri1,Keçeci Ayla2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Düzce University Health Application and Research Center, Düzce, Turkey

2. Düzce University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, Düzce, Turkey

Abstract

Background Most of the research on physical restraint is focused on determining patients’ experiences of restraint, the consequences of restraint, and healthcare professionals’ perceptions and attitudes. The aim of this study was to determine the opinions of the relatives of patients, who are a critical component of care, about physical restraint. The study used the mixed methods research approach, which combines quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. Method The study population consisted of 984 relatives of patients hospitalized in units where physical restraint was commonly applied between January 2018 and December 2018, and the sample consisted of 277 relatives of patients. The qualitative sample of the study consisted of 22 patient's relatives who were interviewed using the maximum diversity sampling method, a purposive sampling method. The quantitative data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, Chi Square (X2-Chi Square) test, and the qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. Results The results showed that consent for physical restraint was generally obtained from spouses, physical restraint was applied to prevent self-harm, but relatives of the patients were insufficiently informed and worried about complications. It was also found that the most frequent reasons for physical restraint were self-harm and facilitation of treatment and care for the male patients and the feeling of helplessness for the female patients. Conclusion It was determined that the relatives of patients regarded physical restraint for treatment positively, but they were worried about complications, and they were mostly insufficiently informed before the intervention.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3