The Next Generation of Clinical-Psychological Science: Moving Toward Anti-Racism

Author:

Rodriguez-Seijas Craig1ORCID,McClendon Juliette2,Wendt Dennis C.3,Novacek Derek M.45,Ebalu Tracie6,Hallion Lauren S.6,Hassan Nima Y.7,Huson Kelsey3,Spielmans Glen I.7,Folk Johanna B.8,Khazem Lauren R.9,Neblett Enrique W.10ORCID,Cunningham Tony J.1112,Hampton-Anderson Joya13,Steinman Shari A.14,Hamilton Jessica L.15,Mekawi Yara16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Michigan

2. Director of Medical Affairs, Big Health, San Francisco California;

3. Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University

4. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles

5. Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California

6. Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh

7. Department of Psychology, Metropolitan State University

8. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco

9. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University

10. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan

11. Center for Sleep and Cognition, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

12. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School

13. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory School of Medicine

14. Department of Psychology, West Virginia University

15. Department of Psychology, Rutgers University

16. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville

Abstract

The field of clinical-psychological science exists in a broader field of psychology that is increasingly acknowledged as embedded in racist and white-supremacist history. In the production of clinical-psychological science, the clinical science model predominates as one of the most influential scientific voices that emphasizes the value of rigorous scientific theory, training, and praxis. We highlight some of the ways in which the clinical science model has neglected anti-racism. By examining the idiosyncratic development of the clinical science model in clinical-psychological science, we outline how its failure to contend with systemic racism in the field propagates a racist subdiscipline. Our hope is that by enacting difficult self-reflection, we invite other stakeholders in our field to think more critically about how systemic racism and white supremacy pervade our structures and institutions and to begin making more concrete changes that move the clinical-psychological-science field toward explicit anti-racism.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Psychology

Reference126 articles.

1. Academy of Psychological Clinical Science. (2022). [Home page]. https://www.acadpsychclinicalscience.org/

2. Mechanisms of Mental-Health Disparities Among Minoritized Groups: How Well Are the Top Journals in Clinical Psychology Representing This Work?

3. Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre. (2021a). Racialization. https://www.aclrc.com/racialization

4. Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre. (2021b). White privilege. https://www.aclrc.com/white-privilege

5. Removing Obstacles To Eliminating Racial And Ethnic Disparities In Behavioral Health Care

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3