Replicability and Generalizability of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Networks: A Cross-Cultural Multisite Study of PTSD Symptoms in Four Trauma Patient Samples

Author:

Fried Eiko I.1ORCID,Eidhof Marloes B.2,Palic Sabina3,Costantini Giulio4,Huisman-van Dijk Hilde M.5,Bockting Claudi L. H.26,Engelhard Iris56,Armour Cherie7,Nielsen Anni B. S.89,Karstoft Karen-Inge8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2. Arq Psychotrauma Expert Group Diemen/Oegstgeest, The Netherlands

3. Competence Center for Transcultural Psychiatry, Mental Health Center Ballerup, Copenhagen, Denmark

4. Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy

5. Altrecht Academic Anxiety Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands

6. Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

7. Psychology Research Institute, Ulster University, Coleraine Campus, Northern Ireland

8. Research and Knowledge Center, The Danish Veteran Center, Ringsted, Denmark

9. The Research Unit and Section of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

The growing literature conceptualizing mental disorders like posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as networks of interacting symptoms faces three key challenges. Prior studies predominantly used (a) small samples with low power for precise estimation, (b) nonclinical samples, and (c) single samples. This renders network structures in clinical data, and the extent to which networks replicate across data sets, unknown. To overcome these limitations, the present cross-cultural multisite study estimated regularized partial correlation networks of 16 PTSD symptoms across four data sets of traumatized patients receiving treatment for PTSD (total N = 2,782). Despite differences in culture, trauma type, and severity of the samples, considerable similarities emerged, with moderate to high correlations between symptom profiles (0.43–0.82), network structures (0.62–0.74), and centrality estimates (0.63–0.75). We discuss the importance of future replicability efforts to improve clinical psychological science and provide code, model output, and correlation matrices to make the results of this article fully reproducible.

Funder

European Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3