System-Centered Care: How Bureaucracy and Racialization Decenter Attempts at Person-Centered Mental Health Care

Author:

Desai Miraj U.12ORCID,Paranamana Nadika3,Dovidio John F.456,Davidson Larry16,Stanhope Victoria7

Affiliation:

1. Program for Recovery and Community Health, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine

2. South Asian Studies Council, Yale University

3. Department of Psychology, University of Hartford

4. Department of Psychology, Yale University

5. Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale University

6. Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University

7. Silver School of Social Work, New York University

Abstract

In this study, we explored structural biases in mental health organizations in the context of person-centered care—an emerging framework for health systems globally. The findings revealed how institutional structures powerfully condition clinical operations and providers, creating a risk that clients will be systemically seen as nonpersons, that is, as racialized or bureaucratic objects. Specifically, we elucidate how racial profiles could become determinants of care within institutions and how another, covert form of institutional objectification could emerge, in which clients are reduced to unseen bureaucratic objects. The findings illuminated a basic psychosocial process through which staff could become unwitting carriers of systemic agenda and intentionality—a type of “bureaucra-think”—and also how some providers pushed against this climate. These findings, and emergent novel concepts, add to the severely limited research on institutional bias and racism within psychological science.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Psychology

Reference75 articles.

1. Clinical Care Across Cultures

2. One Size Does Not Fit All: Taking Diversity, Culture and Context Seriously

3. American Psychological Association. (2017). Multicultural guidelines: An ecological approach to context, identity, and intersectionality. http://www.apa.org/about/policy/multicultural-guidelines.pdf

4. American Psychological Association. (2019). APA guidelines on race and ethnicity in psychology: Promoting responsiveness and equity. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-race-ethnicity.pdf

5. How Structural Racism Works — Racist Policies as a Root Cause of U.S. Racial Health Inequities

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3