Whose Signals Are Being Amplified? Toward a More Equitable Clinical Psychophysiology

Author:

Bradford Daniel E.1ORCID,DeFalco Angelica1,Perkins Emily R.2ORCID,Carbajal Iván1,Kwasa Jasmine3ORCID,Goodman Fallon R.4ORCID,Jackson Felicia5,Richardson Lietsel N. S.6ORCID,Woodley Nina7,Neuberger Lindsay8,Sandoval Jennifer A.8,Huang Helen J.6ORCID,Joyner Keanan J.9

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychological Science, Oregon State University

2. Department of Psychology, Florida State University

3. Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University

4. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, George Washington University

5. Jackson Psychological Services, LLC, Atlanta, GA

6. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Central Florida

7. Pure Avidity Salon, Orlando, FL

8. Nicholson School of Communication and Media, University of Central Florida

9. Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Research using psychophysiological methods holds great promise for refining clinical assessment, identifying risk factors, and informing treatment. Unfortunately, unique methodological features of existing approaches limit inclusive research participation and, consequently, generalizability. In this brief overview and commentary, we provide a snapshot of the current state of representation in clinical psychophysiology with a focus on the forms and consequences of ongoing exclusion of Black participants. We illustrate issues of inequity and exclusion that are unique to clinical psychophysiology and consider intersections among social constructions of Blackness and biased design of current technology used to measure electroencephalography, skin conductance, and other signals. We then highlight work by groups dedicated to quantifying and addressing these limitations. We discuss the need for reflection and input from a wider variety of affected individuals to develop and refine new technologies given the risk of further widening disparities. Finally, we provide broad recommendations for clinical-psychophysiology research.

Funder

National Institute of Mental Health

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Psychology

Reference97 articles.

1. American Psychological Association. (2021a). APA resolution on harnessing psychology to combat racism: Adopting a uniform definition and understanding. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/resolution-combat-racism.pdf

2. American Psychological Association. (2021b). Inclusive language guidelines. https://www.apa.org/about/apa/equity-diversity-inclusion/language-guidelines.pdf

3. Berardesca E., Maibach H. (2003). Ethnic skin: Overview of structure and function. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 48(Suppl. 6), S139–S142. https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2003.273

4. Blumenthal T. D., Cuthbert B. N., Filion D. L., Hackley S., Lipp O. V., Van Boxtel A. (2005). Committee report: Guidelines for human startle eyeblink electromyographic studies. Psychophysiology, 42(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00271.x

5. Boucsein W. (1992). Electrodermal activity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1126-0

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3