Affiliation:
1. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
2. University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, Australia
Abstract
The development of global metrics for evaluating university research performance has been accompanied by increasing attention to key performance metrics for individual disciplines. This paper examines research performance metrics for Australian planning academics. It addresses questions related to programs, staff, publications, and citations. The main findings are the following: Wide gender gaps exist in Australian planning academia; the mean number of publications is 36 per person, or 3 per person per year; the mean number of citations is 527 per person, or 48 per person per year; and planning journal impact factors are low (less than 3).
Subject
Urban Studies,Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference41 articles.
1. Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis
2. Australian Research Council. 2016. “ARC Grants.” Accessed January 19, 2016. http://rms.arc.gov.au/RMS/Report/Download/Report/d6b15b2b-3a50-4021-8e6f-6c7ef1cba553/0.
3. Batterbury Simon, Byrne. Jason 2017. “Australia: Reclaiming the Public University.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective. Accessed October 4, 2018. https://social-epistemology.com/2017/07/13/international-responses-to-the-academic-manifesto-reports-from-14-countries-willem-halffman-and-hans-radder/2018.
4. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献