Use of EHR-Based Pediatric Quality Measures: Views of Health System Leaders and Parents

Author:

Hartley David M.12ORCID,Jonas Susannah2,Grossoehme Daniel12,Kelly Amy3,Dodds Cassandra2,Alford Shannon M.4,Shenkman Elizabeth4,Simmons Jeff12,Bailey L. Charles5,Razzaghi Hanieh5,Utidjian Levon H.5,McCafferty-Fernandez Jennifer6,Cole F. Sessions7,Smallwood Jordan8,Werk Lloyd N.8,Walsh Kathleen E.12

Affiliation:

1. University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH

2. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

3. Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health, Devon, PA

4. University of Florida, Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, Gainesville, FL

5. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA

6. Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, Miami, FL

7. Washington University College of Medicine, St Louis, MO

8. Nemours Children’s Hospital, Orlando, FL

Abstract

Measures of health care quality are produced from a variety of data sources, but often, physicians do not believe these measures reflect the quality of provided care. The aim was to assess the value to health system leaders (HSLs) and parents of benchmarking on health care quality measures using data mined from the electronic health record (EHR). Using in-context interviews with HSLs and parents, the authors investigated what new decisions and actions benchmarking using data mined from the EHR may enable and how benchmarking information should be presented to be most informative. Results demonstrate that although parents may have little experience using data on health care quality for decision making, they affirmed its potential value. HSLs expressed the need for high-confidence, validated metrics. They also perceived barriers to achieving meaningful metrics but recognized that mining data directly from the EHR could overcome those barriers. Parents and HSLs need high-confidence health care quality data to support decision making.

Funder

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3