Should We Really Be Afraid of “Weakness”? Applying the Insights of Attribution Theory

Abstract

It is widely assumed that the term “weakness” has negative psychological effects and should be replaced by “area for improvement.” The present study is the first to examine the matter experimentally. It was hypothesised that effects of “weakness” (vs. “area for improvement”) are most pronounced in those with low perceived self-efficacy in the relevant domain. Two experiments were conducted in the domain of self-regulation. In those with low perceived self-efficacy for self-regulation (PSESR), “weakness” apparently had a negative indirect effect on improvement expectancy by increasing the perceived stability (Experiment 1) or lowering the perceived controllability (Experiment 2) of the problem. Moreover, at low levels of PSESR in Experiment 2, estimated indirect effects of “weakness” on perceived value of improvement were both positive and negative. However, gender apparently moderated those effects. “Weakness” apparently lowered perceived controllability in both males and females but in women the negative effect was more pronounced when PSESR was low. In addition, “weakness” apparently increased perceived internality in males with low PSESR. Compared to “area for improvement,” “weakness” may indeed have some (negative) psychological effects in people with low perceived self-efficacy in the relevant domain. Given the ubiquity of these terms in evaluative contexts and the widespread fears of the term “weakness,” more experimental research needs to be conducted.