An investigation of two interventions for micrographia in individuals with Parkinson’s disease

Author:

Bryant MS1,Rintala DH2,Lai EC3,Protas EJ4

Affiliation:

1. School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX,

2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

3. Parkinson's Disease Research, Education and Clinical Center, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

4. School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA

Abstract

Objective: This pilot study was designed to compare a change in micrographia between using grid lines and parallel horizontal lines as visual cues in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Design: Single group pre- and post-test. Setting: Research lab. Participants: Eleven males with Parkinson’s disease. Interventions: Practice writing words with parallel and grid lines. The sequence of practising was randomized. Main outcome measures: Length of words. Results: The length of the words after practising with parallel lines was longer than in the initial free writing condition (17.83 ± 3.93 cm vs. 23.36 ± 5.82 cm, P =0.008). The length of the words after practising with grid lines was also longer than during free writing (17.83 ± 3.93 cm vs. 22.65 ± 4.04 cm, P =0.003). The length of the words after practising with parallel lines was not different from that after practising with grid lines. Conclusion: Improvements in letter size after practising with horizontal parallel lines and grid lines were not different. The addition of vertical lines to form a grid did not appear to improve the writing more than horizontal lines alone in persons with Parkinson’s disease who experienced micrographia.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3