Psychometric properties of light touch-pressure somatosensory measures in adults with neurological disorders: A systematic review

Author:

Vora Isha1ORCID,Kline Danielle K1,McCauley Colleen A2,Link Angela3,Asiello Jessica D45,Gaudino Shonali G6,Reilly William J7,Keilty Matthew S2,Banks Russell E8ORCID,Kimberley Teresa J18

Affiliation:

1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA

2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Cape Cod, Cape Cod, MA, USA

3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, USA

4. Department of Occupational Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

5. Department of Occupational Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA

6. Spaulding Rehabilitation Network, Boston, MA, USA

7. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Cambridge, Cambridge, MA, USA

8. Department of Physical Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Objectives To critically appraise the psychometric properties of light touch-pressure somatosensory assessments to provide guidance for tool selection for research or clinical purposes. Data sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycInfo were searched for research indexed from January 1990-November 2022. English language and human subject filters were applied. “Somatosensation”, “psychometric property”, and “nervous system-based health condition” search terms were combined. Grey literature and manual searches were conducted to ensure thoroughness. Review methods The reliability, construct validity, and/or measurement error of light touch-pressure assessments was reviewed in adult populations with neurological disorders. Reviewers individually extracted and managed data including patient demographics, assessment characteristics, statistical methods, and psychometric properties. Methodological quality of results was evaluated using an adapted version of the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. Results Thirty-three of 1938 articles were included for review. Fifteen light touch-pressure assessments demonstrated good or excellent reliability. Further, five of those 15 assessments achieved adequate validity and one of the 15 assessments achieved adequate measurement error. Over 80% of the summarized study ratings were determined to be of low or very low quality. Conclusion We recommend using electrical perceptual tests, the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments, the Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension, and the Moving Touch Pressure Test given that they demonstrated good to excellent results in three psychometric properties. No other assessment achieved adequate ratings in more than two psychometric properties. This review highlights a fundamental need to develop sensory assessments that are reliable, valid, and sensitive to change.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3