Effectiveness of electrotherapy for the treatment of orofacial pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

de Castro-Carletti Ester Moreira12ORCID,Müggenborg Frauke2,Dennett Liz3,Sobral de Oliveira-Souza Ana Izabela24ORCID,Mohamad Norazlin35,Pertille Adriana1,Rodrigues-Bigaton Delaine6,Armijo-Olivo Susan237

Affiliation:

1. Post Graduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Methodist University of Piracicaba – UNIMEP – Piracicaba (SP), Brazil

2. Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, Hochschule Osnabrück-University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrück, Germany

3. Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Research Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

4. Graduate Program in Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Pernambuco, Brazil

5. Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre of Physiotherapy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam Campus, Malaysia

6. Post Graduate Program in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas – UNICAMP – Piracicaba (SP), Brazil

7. Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Abstract

Objective Summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials and controlled trials that examined the effectiveness of electrotherapy in the treatment of patients with orofacial pain. Data Source Medline, Embase, CINAHL PLUS with Full text, Cochrane Library Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus. Review Methods A data search (last update, July 1, 2022) and a manual search were performed (October 5, 2022). Trials involving adults with orofacial pain receiving electrotherapy compared with any other type of treatment were included. The main outcome was pain intensity; secondary outcomes were mouth opening and tenderness. The reporting was based on the new PRISMA Guidelines. Results From the electronics databases and manual search 43 studies were included. Although this study was open to including any type of orofacial pain, only studies that investigated temporomandibular disorders were found. The overall quality of the evidence for pain intensity was very low. Although the results should be carefully used, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation therapy showed to be clinically superior to placebo for reducing pain after treatment (2.63 [−0.48; 5.74]) and at follow-up (0.96 [−0.02; 1.95]) and reduce tenderness after treatment (1.99 [−0.33; 4.32]) and at follow-up (2.43 [−0.24; 5.10]) in subjects with mixed temporomandibular disorders. Conclusion The results of this systematic review support the use of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation therapy for patients with mixed temporomandibular disorders to improve pain intensity, and tenderness demonstrating that transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation is superior to placebo. There is inconsistent evidence supporting the superiority of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation against other therapies.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoa de Nível Superior

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3