A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of intermittent and continuous traction for patients with knee osteoarthritis

Author:

Alpayci Mahmut1,Ozkan Yasemin2,Yazmalar Levent3,Hiz Ozcan4,Ediz Levent4

Affiliation:

1. Bitlis State Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bitlis, Turkey

2. Igdır State Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Igdır, Turkey

3. Ipekyolu State Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Van, Turkey

4. Yuzuncu Yil University Medical Faculty, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Van, Turkey

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of intermittent and continuous traction in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Design: A randomized, controlled, observer-blind seven-week trial. Setting: Hospital-based outpatient practice. Subjects: Ninety-eight patients with stage 3 knee osteoarthritis according to Kellgren–Lawrence radiological rating scale. Interventions: All 98 patients were randomly assigned to three treatment groups, for three weeks (weekends excluded). The control group ( n=30, mean age: 59.30±8.16) received hot pack and short wave diathermy; the intermittent group ( n=30, mean age: 58.20±7.78) received hot pack, short wave diathermy and intermittent traction; and the continuous group ( n=30, mean age: 57.97±9.53) received hot pack, short wave diathermy and continuous traction. Outcome measurements: The values of the Turkish version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog scale, and knee passive range of motion were measured at baseline, three-week and seven-week follow-up. Results: Compared with baseline at weeks 3 and 7, all the outcome measures, except range of motion, were significantly reduced in all groups (all P≤0.001). In terms of the change data from baseline to week 3, both traction groups were significantly superior to the control in the WOMAC physical function scores. Considering the change data from baseline to week 7, both traction groups were significantly superior to the control in the pain scores, physical function and total scores, while only the continuous group was significantly better than the control in the stiffness scores (control: 1.17 ± 1.64; continuous: 2.38 ± 1.44) ( P=0.014). Compared with baseline at weeks 3 and 7, range of motion values significantly increased in both traction groups ( P<0.05) but not in the control ( P>0.05). However, there were no significant differences among the three groups considering the change data from baseline to week 7 in range of motion values ( P=0.300). Conclusions: Joint traction was found to be beneficial for the improvement of pain and physical function loss related to knee osteoarthritis.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3