What is ‘successful rehabilitation’? A multi-stakeholder nominal group technique study to inform rehabilitation outcome measurement

Author:

Wallace Sarah J1ORCID,Barnett Amandine2,Cheng Bonnie BY1,Lowe Joshua1,Campbell Katrina L23,Young Adrienne M4

Affiliation:

1. Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

2. Centre for Applied Health Economics, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia

3. Healthcare Excellence and Innovation, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia

4. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

Abstract

Objective To explore how stakeholders in rehabilitation conceptualise ‘successful rehabilitation’, to inform the development of a minimum dataset and core outcomes for sub-acute rehabilitation. Design Qualitative consensus study using the nominal group technique. Setting Online focus groups. Participants Consumer representatives ( n = 7), clinicians ( n = 15), and health service managers ( n = 9) from Australia. Intervention Participants responded to the question, ‘What does successful rehabilitation look like?’. Following item generation, they prioritised their top five responses, allocating 100 points across items to denote relative importance. Main measures Prioritised responses were analysed across stakeholder groups using qualitative content analysis. Results Ten themes were identified. ‘Successful rehabilitation’ is: (1) person and family centred; (2) effective; (3) inter-professional; (4) accessible; (5) goal oriented with meaningful outcomes; (6) connected to the continuum of care; (7) evidence-based and supportive of innovation and research; (8) appropriately funded and skilled; (9) satisfying and engaging; and (10) safe. Conclusions Stakeholder-defined ‘successful rehabilitation’ aligned with principles of value-based care and evidence-based rehabilitation. Provision and receipt of person and family centred care was the most important indicator of successful rehabilitation. Measures of success should include indicators of structure, process, outcome, and experience, and be conducted at multiple time-points.

Funder

Metro North Hospital and Health Service and University of Queensland

Menzies Health Institute Queensland

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Reference33 articles.

1. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

2. Rehabilitation: The health strategy of the 21st century

3. World Health Organization. Rehabilitation in health systems. 2017. https://www.who.int/initiatives/rehabilitation-2030.

4. World Health Organization. Rehabilitation 2030 – a call for action. Background paper: The need to scale up rehabilitation. 2017. https://www.who.int/initiatives/rehabilitation-2030.

5. World Health Organization. Rehabilitation in health systems: Guide for action. 2019. https://www.who.int/initiatives/rehabilitation-2030.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3