Emotion-focused dyadic coping styles used by family carers of people with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author:

Colclough Carmen1ORCID,Miles Eleanor1,Rusted Jennifer1ORCID,Perach Rotem2,Hicks Ben34ORCID,Dixon Josie5ORCID,Dangoor Margaret5ORCID,Gridley Kate6ORCID,Birks Yvonne6ORCID,Donaghy Paul7ORCID,Mcardle Riona7,Moseley Elen8,Sondh Harsharon K8,Banerjee Sube9ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

2. School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK

3. Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK

4. University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

5. Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK

6. Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK

7. Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

8. South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

9. Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK

Abstract

Emotional wellbeing of family carers and people with dementia is associated with not only how each individual copes with stress and conflict, but also by how they cope together. Finding ways to positively cope together was particularly important during COVID-19 lockdown restrictions, when other avenues of emotional support were less available. We explored how carers experienced and used emotion-focused dyadic coping styles during the COVID-19 pandemic. In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted during the pandemic with 42 family carers, supplemented by quality of life scores collected both pre- and during the pandemic and household status. Abductive thematic analysis identified five styles of emotion-focused dyadic coping: common, supportive, hostile, disengaged avoidance and protective. The COVID-19 pandemic left many dyads unsupported. While many carers adapted, reporting increases in quality of life and enjoying the extra time with the person with dementia, others experienced dyadic conflict and reductions in quality of life. This variation was associated with dyadic coping styles, including challenges in using ‘positive’ styles and the protective use of ‘negative’ disengaged avoidance in the right situations. Dyadic coping styles also differed as a function of whether the dyad lived together. As many people with dementia are supported by an informal carer, considering how they cope together could help us to better support them. We make suggestions for dyadic interventions tailored by co-residency status that could help dyads identify and communicate coping needs, reconnect following avoidance coping, and replenish their coping resources through social support.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,General Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3