Increased community engagement of Indigenous Peoples in dementia research leads to higher context relevance of results

Author:

Kjerland Tonya M1ORCID,Schroeder Shawnda1ORCID,Tofaeono Va’atausili1ORCID,Walls Melissa2ORCID,Gone Joseph P34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Indigenous Health, University of North Dakota, USA

2. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA

3. Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, USA

4. Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, USA

Abstract

Introduction Health research that focuses on Indigenous Peoples must ensure that the community in question is actively engaged, and that the results have context relevance for Indigenous Peoples. Context relevance is “the benefits, usability, and respectful conduct of research from the perspective of Indigenous communities.” The purpose of this study was to apply two tools within an already-published scoping review of 76 articles featuring research on cognitive impairment and dementia among Indigenous Peoples worldwide. One tool assessed levels of community engagement reported in the corpus, and the other tool assessed the context relevance of recommendations in the corpus. We hypothesized that research with higher levels of reported community engagement would produce recommendations with greater context relevance for Indigenous Peoples. Methods We employed semi-structured deductive coding using two novel tools assessing levels of reported community engagement and context relevance of recommendations based on studies included in the existing scoping review. Results Application of the two tools revealed a positive relationship between increasing community engagement and greater context relevance. Community engagement primarily occurred in studies conducted with First Nations, Inuit, and Métis populations in Canada and with Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Peoples. Research with Alaska Native, American Indian, and Native Hawaiian Peoples in the USA stood out for its comparative lack of meaningful community engagement. Discussion There is opportunity to utilize these tools, and the results of this assessment, to enhance training and mentorship for researchers who work with Indigenous populations. There is a need to increase investigator capacity to involve communities throughout all phases of research, particularly in the pre-research stages.

Funder

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference81 articles.

1. 2021 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures

2. Tribal IRBs: A Framework for Understanding Research Oversight in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities

3. Bahnke M., Korthuis V., Philemonoff A., Johnson M. (2020, March 19). Letter to the National Science Foundation’s Navigating the New Arctic Program (NNA). Kawerak. https://kawerak.org/download/navigating-the-new-arctic-program-comment-letter/

4. No one’s discussing the elephant in the room: contemplating questions of research impact and benefit in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian health research

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3