Affiliation:
1. University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA
Abstract
In this article, I ask, “How do angry feminist claims get heard?” Angry feminist claims, I argue, inform, and mobilize by resonating with empathetic communities, legitimating feelings and experiences, and triggering energetic transfers among feminists and non-feminists. Through analysis of the 2018 protests of the nomination and confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the United States Supreme Court, I illustrate how angry feminist claims can be reclaimed as rational expressions of injustice, prompting divergent responses among differently situated audiences. Further, I demonstrate how anger as part of an affective appeal activates those attuned to hearing angry feminist claims as rational and legitimate, while simultaneously being challenged by intragroup intersectional differences.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference87 articles.
1. Abramson Jill. 2018. “In the Elevator, Two Rape Survivors Show How Democracy Works.” The Guardian, September 28, 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/28/elevatorvideo-ana-maria-archila-maria-gallagher-democracy
2. The Cultural Politics of Emotion
3. Archila Ana Maria. 2019. “I confronted Jeff Flake during the Kavanaugh hearings. One year later, I regret nothing.” Vox, September 28, 2019. https://www.vox.com/first-person/2019/9/28/20887050/kavanaugh-hearings-jeff-flake