Affiliation:
1. University of Colorado-Boulder
2. University of Notre Dame,
Abstract
Given the centralization of power in contemporary Russia, can nonexecutive institutions exercise some power, especially institutions such as high courts, which are critical to establishing the rule of law? In particular, can high courts influence the Russian public through their power to persuade? Using experiments embedded in three surveys of more than 6,000 Russians each, the authors find that the Supreme and Constitutional Courts, as well as the Duma, have persuasive power but greater potential to persuade tolerant Russians to be intolerant than vice versa. The findings have powerful implications for understanding the judicial role in protecting the rights and liberties of minorities.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference81 articles.
1. Adamany, David, and Joel B. Grossman . 1983. Support for the Supreme Court as a national policy maker. In American court systems: Readings in judicial process and behavior, ed. S. Goldman and A. Sarat, 201-16. New York: Longman.
2. Comrades into Citizens? Russian Political Culture and Public Support for the Transition
3. Tolerance, Transition, and Support for Civil Liberties in Russia
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献