Unpacking Agenda Control in Congress: Individual Roll Rates and the Republican Revolution

Author:

Carson Jamie L.1,Monroe Nathan W.2,Robinson Gregory3

Affiliation:

1. University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

2. University of California, Merced, Merced, CA, USA

3. Binghamton University (State University of New York), Binghamton, NY, USA,

Abstract

The twelve years following the Republican revolution provide ideal ground to test existing theories of congressional behavior and organization. The authors examine the incidence of individual roll rates in the U.S. House to “unpack” the degree to which the 1994 election produced a change in agenda control and examine how it affected roll rates. Then, to understand differences in agenda control, we compare majority and minority party roll rates before and after the election. The results confirm majority party influence over the House agenda and show that the Republican leadership exhibited remarkably similar behavior to the Democrats prior to 1995.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference44 articles.

1. Why Parties?

2. The Transition to Republican Rule in the House: Implications for Theories of Congressional Politics

3. The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee

4. Aldrich, John H. and David W. Rohde. 2001. The logic of conditional party government: Revisiting the electoral connection. In Congress reconsidered , eds. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, 269-92. 7th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

5. Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde . 2005. Congressional committees in a partisan era. In Congress reconsidered, ed. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, 249-70. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Parties, preferences and influence in legislative decision-making;Party Politics;2023-04-15

2. Southern Republicans in Congress during the pre-Reagan era: An exploration;Party Politics;2022-04-28

3. A Sum of Its Parts: Party Fit and Party Change in the U.S. House;American Politics Research;2021-04-04

4. Index;Rejecting Compromise;2020-01-31

5. References;Rejecting Compromise;2020-01-31

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3