Benefits and Limitations of the Minimally Invasive Postmortem: A Review of an Innovative Service Development

Author:

Hyde Georgia1ORCID,Rummery Rachel2,Whitby Elspeth H13,Bloor Jessica2,Raghavan Ashok3,Cohen Marta C24ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Academic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

2. Histopathology Department, Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Western Bank, Sheffield, UK

3. Radiology Department, Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Western Bank, Sheffield, UK

4. Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Abstract

Introduction Pediatric postmortem (PM) rates have significantly declined, creating a need for effective minimally invasive alternatives to correlate with parental wishes. We review the use of a minimally invasive fetal and neonatal PM service further to preliminary findings published in 2015. Materials and Methods Cases taken from the mortuary electronic database from 2012 to 2017 are analyzed. The minimally invasive service consisted primarily of external examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and placental examination. Any significant conditions found noted. All pathology reports include a Relevant Condition at Death (ReCoDe) obstetric classification. Reports analyzed to determine which aspects of the service provided positive information. Results Of 1498 perinatal postmortems, 105 (7%) were PM MRI, of which 75.24% were intrauterine fetal deaths. Relevant conditions were identified in 94 cases (89.52%), and ReCoDe categories in 80 cases (76.19%). Moreover, 90% of cases had a ReCoDe condition, with 10% unclassified. Seven cases had more than 1 ReCoDe. Main conditions related to placenta (32.5%) and umbilical cord (27.5%). The most informative elements were placental examination and MRI. Conclusion Minimally invasive PMs are a viable alternative to traditional autopsy when this option is refused. However, further case analysis is needed to determine potential bias toward certain classification codes.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3