Comparison of the Autopsy and Placental Findings in Second vs Third Trimester Stillbirth

Author:

Manjee Kiran1,Price Erica2,Ernst Linda M.23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA

2. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA

3. Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

Abstract

Background: The pathology of second trimester fetal loss is not well-characterized due to lack of comprehensive autopsy studies. The purpose of this study is to compare autopsy pathology of second trimester and third trimester stillbirth. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, fetal autopsies performed in-house with complete placental examination were included. From autopsy reports, maternal demographics, gestational age, sex, body and placental weight, congenital anomalies, and cause of death (COD) were obtained. Immediate COD was coded “probable” or “possible” according to Initial Causes of Fetal Death (INCODE). Results: Among 68 second trimester and 54 third trimester fetal autopsies, at least 1 probable COD was identified in 59/68 (87%) second trimester and 44/54 (81%) third trimester cases. 42/68 (62%) second trimester and 28/54 (52%) third trimester fetuses had probable COD secondary to placental pathology. Among placental causes, 29/42 (69%) second trimester and 14/28 (50%) third trimester stillbirths were related to compromised fetal microcirculation with umbilical cord abnormality. Conclusions: Among stillborn first and second trimester fetuses who undergo autopsy, the most prevalent COD is pathologic placental conditions, particularly those associated with umbilical cord obstruction. This study stresses the importance of placenta examination for establishing COD in both second and third trimester fetuses.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3