A Construct Validity Study of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

Author:

Cohen David1,Cohen Marilye1,Cross Herbert1

Affiliation:

1. Washington State University

Abstract

This study assessed the construct validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, MBTI (Myers, 1976). The rationale was that friends or relatives can make judgments about an individual which will be associated with his/her predominant personality type. Forty-eight subjects rated themselves on two seven-point Likert scales designed to assess behavioral styles. These inventories (designated, "Behavioral Style Inventories") were designed for this study based on the operational definitions of type outlined by Myers in the manual to the MBTI. One inventory assessed perceptions held by subjects of themselves (Form S); the other was a measure of perceptions of their ideal selves (Form I). Forty-five of the subjects were also independently rated by their spouses who used a similar form of the inventory (Form M). All subjects then took the MBTI. Scores were converted to type categories and compared by using the coefficient of agreement for nominal data, Kappa. Self-typing on Form S of the Behavioral Styles Inventory (BSI) showed no agreement with the MBTI. Self-typing based on use of Form I (measure of ideal self) of the BSI showed no agreement with that from the MBTI; whereas, Kappa coefficients comparing the type categories of extrovert-introvert (E-I), sensation-intuition (S-N), and thinking-feeling (T-F) between the MBTI and the form of the BSI filled out by the spouses all showed significant positive values: E-I, Kappa = .70, P < .001; T-F, Kappa = .78, p < .001; S-N, Kappa - .43, p < .01. The Kappa for the J-P scale was not significant (Kappa = -.08. The construct validity of the MBTI scales of Extroversion-Introversion, Sensation-Intuition, and Thinking-Feeling was supported, whereas that of the Judging-Perceiving scale was not.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Reference14 articles.

1. Jung's Psychological Types.

2. Studies of Jungian typology: I. Memory, social perception, and social action1

3. An Assessment of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

4. A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

5. Harrison, N.W. Validation of Jung's typological framework. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976, (Sept.), 37 (3-A), 1967.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Mount Rushmore;Motivation for Learning and Performance;2015

2. Early Adoption of New Drug Treatments;Critical Pathways in Cardiology: A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine;2007-03

3. Research Report: Correlates of learning styles and counsellor trainees' age and gender;Counselling Psychology Quarterly;2003-12

4. Presidential Character Revisited;Political Psychology;1997-12

5. Synthesizing Results From an Interest and a Personality Inventory to Improve Career Decision Making;Journal of Employment Counseling;1992-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3