Affiliation:
1. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA,
2. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
Abstract
Under the No Child Left Behind Act, large-scale test score trend analyses are widespread. These analyses often gloss over interesting changes in test score distributions and involve unrealistic assumptions. Further complications arise from analyses of unanchored, censored assessment data, or proportions of students lying within performance levels defined by unspecified cut scores. This article introduces ‘‘shift models,’’ particularly the ‘‘normal-shift’’ model, to summarize the limited information available in censored data and to support distribution-wide trend analyses. A simulation study exploring this model’s estimation procedure—an expectation-maximization algorithm for maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) of normally distributed censored data—found that the MLEs exhibit little to no bias over a range of sample sizes and cut scores. The normal-shift model was applied to two full state data sets and performed well in recovering effect size estimates in censored scenarios, except when censoring occurred at cut scores that generated particularly unrepresentative trends. The normal-shift model facilitates effect size estimation for unanchored, censored assessment data and, when applied to a large, cross-state data set, revealed significant positive trends from 2003-2005 and 2005-2007 for most states.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献