Abstract
Validity scores for items were obtained by comparing the rank order of the correlations between each item and six criterion measures with the corresponding rank order for the test as a whole. For samples of about 85 cases, the validity pattern for each of two tests showed limited consistency from sample to sample and the item validity scores had low correlations between samples. While sample size contributed to these undependabilities, the additional undependability of item responses themselves raises strong doubts about the practicality of selecting items on the basis of their validity patterns.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献