Affiliation:
1. Auburn University
2. University of Washington
3. University of Southern California
Abstract
This study compares two-option multiple-choice vocabulary test items with comparably written true-false test items. Results indicate that the multiple-choice format provides a significantly more reliable measure than the true-false format. Results further indicate that the true and false items do not appear to be measuring the same abilities. Potential strategies are discussed that an examinee may use for solving two-option multiple-choice and true-false test items in an effort to explain these results.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献