Affiliation:
1. University of Southern California, Los Angeles and Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education, University of California, Los Angeles
Abstract
When determining the length of a criterion-referenced test, results in van den Brink and Koele (1980) and Wilcox (1980a, 1980b) indicate that the problem of guessing might be more serious than may have been expected. Recently, however, a new method of scoring tests was proposed that corrects for guessing without assuming guessing is at random. Moreover, empirical investigations suggest that the underlying assumptions of the new scoring procedure will frequently hold. This paper indicates how test length might be determined when the new scoring procedure is used. The results indicate that test length might be substantially reduced when the new scoring rule can be applied.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Strong True‐Score Theory;Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online;2014-11-17
2. Strong True-Score Theory;Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences;2006-08-15
3. A Note on Measuring Item Bias;The Journal of Experimental Education;1985-01
4. Measuring Mental Abilities with Latent State Models;American Journal of Mathematical and Management Sciences;1983-04