Affiliation:
1. University of New Orleans
Abstract
The theory indicating that general linear model methods can be superior to ANOVA analogs is well known. However, the magnitudes of differences induced by different analysis choices has not been empirically investigated. The paper reports a Monte Carlo study of these differences over nine combinations of three sample sizes and three population parameter effect sizes. Generally, ANOVA methods tended somewhat to overestimate smaller effect sizes and to underestimate larger effect sizes.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献