Abstract
Though past research has not supported the strategy of using importance weights in constructing an overall index of job satisfaction from measures of satisfaction with diverse workplace facets, researchers should not be lulled into concluding that importance measures will not be useful in their research. Importance weights not only can contribute a good deal to scaling procedures when a multivariate framework is used that represents the additive and multiplicative contributions of work place facets and facet importance to a criterion, but even where the construction of scales is not of interest, importance weights may be used for tests of the worker-to-job fit hypothesis. These points are illustrated with moderator regression techniques on data representing the job satisfaction of 401 registered nurses in a large Western metropolitan area.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Scoring Weights;Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research;2023
2. Scoring Weights;Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research;2020
3. Do We Need to Weight Satisfaction Scores with Importance Ratings in Measuring Quality of Life?;Social Indicators Research;2006-09
4. A Specification Issue in Job Satisfaction Research;Sociological Perspectives;1985-04