An Empirical Investigation of the Standard Error of Measurement at Different Ability Levels-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An Empirical Investigation of the Standard Error of Measurement at Different Ability Levels

Published:1986-09 Issue:3 Volume:46 Page:545-550
ISSN:0013-1644
Container-title:Educational and Psychological Measurement
language:en
Short-container-title:Educational and Psychological Measurement

Author:

Blixt Sonya L.¹,Shama Deborah D.¹

Affiliation:

1. Kent State University

Abstract

Methods of estimating the standard error at different ability levels were compared. Overall, it was found that at a given ability level the standard errors calculated using different formulas are not appreciably different. Further, for most situations the traditional method of calculating a standard error probably provides sufficient precision.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0013164486463007

Reference3 articles.

1. Series II;Educational Testing Service,1973

2. STANDARD ERRORS OF MEASUREMENT AT DIFFERENT ABILITY LEVELS

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Meta-Analysis of Interrater Reliability of Supervisory Performance Ratings: Effects of Appraisal Purpose, Scale Type, and Range Restriction;Frontiers in Psychology;2019-10-18

2. Conditional Standard Errors of Measurement;Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online;2018-02-15

3. Conditional Standard Errors of Measurement;Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online;2014-09-29

4. Conditional Standard Errors of Measurement;Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science;2005-10-15

5. The Importance of Reliability as It Relates to True Score Confidence Intervals;Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development;2002-07-01