Response Differences and Preferences for All-Category-Defined and End-Defined Likert Formats

Author:

Dixon Paul N.1,Bobo Mackie1,Stevick Richard A.1

Affiliation:

1. Texas Tech University

Abstract

The question as to whether the format of a scale influences results has been examined infrequently and with conflicting answers. Two Likert-type formats, one with all choice points defined and the other with only end-points defined, were administered to 121 subjects. Each subject completed half of the items in the defined and the other half in the end-defined condition. Results were not significantly different between forms, nor did subjects indicate a format preference. Although the end-defined items exhibited greater variability than did the every-point defined items, the results suggest that minor Likert-type format changes do not critically affect outcomes.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Cited by 38 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Beyond Aesthetics: Evaluating Response Widgets for Reliability & Construct Validity of Scale Questionnaires;Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-11

2. The Effect of Option Differences on Psychometric Properties of Items in Likert-Type Scales;Sakarya University Journal of Education;2023-09-10

3. Trust and distrust in buyer–supplier relationships: an exploratory experimental study;International Journal of Operations & Production Management;2023-07-25

4. Examining the factors of college students’ willingness to consume local foods using the health belief model with the addition of social influence and self-identity;Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition;2023-05-07

5. Life Satisfaction Ratings and Response Formats;Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3