Telling Interviewers About Sexual Abuse

Author:

Lippert Tonya1,Cross Theodore P.2,Jones Lisa3,Walsh Wendy3

Affiliation:

1. Dallas Children's Advocacy Center,

2. RTI International

3. University of New Hampshire

Abstract

This study aims to identify characteristics that predict full disclosure by victims of sexual abuse during a forensic interview. Data came from agency files for 987 cases of sexual abuse between December 2001 and December 2003 from Children's Advocacy Centers (CACs) and comparison communities within four U.S. states. Cases of children fully disclosing abuse when interviewed were compared to cases of children believed to be victims who gave no or partial disclosures. The likelihood of disclosure increased when victims were girls, a primary caregiver was supportive, and a child's disclosure instigated the investigation. The likelihood of disclosure was higher for children who were older at abuse onset and at forensic interview (each age variable having an independent effect). Communities differed on disclosure rate, with no difference associated with having a CAC. Findings suggest factors deserving consideration prior to a forensic interview, including organizational and community factors affecting disclosure rates.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference50 articles.

1. Ambivalence of Nonoffending Guardians after Child Sexual Abuse Disclosure

2. Bottoms, B.L., Rudnicki, A.G. & Epstein, M.A. (2007). A retrospective study of factors affecting the disclosure of childhood sexual and physical abuse. In M. Pipe, M. E. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A. Cederborg (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay and denial (pp. 175-194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

3. How do children tell? The disclosure process in child sexual abuse

4. Sexual knowledge and emotional reaction as indicators of sexual abuse in young children: theory and research challenges

5. Developmental Differences in Detection and Disclosure of Sexual Abuse

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3