Delivery and Impact of Foster Parent Training: Similarities and Differences for Relative and Non-Relative Foster Parents

Author:

Koh Eun1ORCID,Bruhn Chris2,Ansong David3,Budde Stephen4,Mann Kimberly5

Affiliation:

1. National Catholic School of Social Service, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA

2. School of Social Work, Aurora University, Aurora, IL, USA

3. School of Social Work, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

4. Juvenile Protective Association, Chicago, IL, USA

5. Office of Research and Child Well-Being, Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Chicago, IL, USA

Abstract

Literature on the delivery and impact of foster parent training, such as the Nurturing Parenting Program (NPP), is sparse, particularly for relative foster parents. This study investigates (a) how NPP referral, initiation, and completion rates vary between relative and non-relative foster parents, (b) reasons for not initiating NPP, and (c) changes in parenting attitudes and behaviors for relative and non-relative foster parents after participating in NPP. The study analyzed data from the Illinois Birth to Three (IB3) study for 722 relative and 397 non-relative foster parents of children ages three and younger. Relative and non-relative foster parents had similar NPP referral and initiation rates, but relatives had significantly lower completion rates. Content analysis of case notes for 498 cases showed that relative foster parents more frequently noted barriers (e.g., childcare, transportation) to NPP initiation. Among NPP completers, both groups reported similar levels of improvements in parenting attitudes and behaviors at the end of NPP, but a pattern of lower scores was observed for relative foster parents. The findings suggest a need for more support for foster parents, particularly relative foster parents.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference52 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3