A Challenge to Orthodoxy in Psychology: Thomas Sowell and Social Justice

Author:

O’Donohue William1ORCID,Silander Nina C.2ORCID,Frisby Craig L.3,Fisher Jane E.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno

2. North Florida/South Georgia Veteran Health System, Jacksonville, FL

3. College of Education & Human Development, University of Missouri

Abstract

Psychologists address social-justice problems in their research and applied work, and their scholarly efforts have been influenced by assumptions, constructs, and hypotheses from the political left. Recently, some psychologists have called for increased intellectual and political diversity in psychology, particularly as such diversity may lead to improved problem-solving. As an attempt to increase intellectual diversity in psychology, we review here the scholarship of Thomas Sowell. His work represents a rich source of hypotheses for psychologists’ future research. We focus on his views on the importance of freedom; the extent to which reforms can reduce freedom; the importance of free markets to human flourishing; the role of free markets in producing costs for discrimination; the way spontaneously ordered systems can contain knowledge that can be overlooked in reforms; and the importance of culture and cultural capital. We will also discuss Sowell’s more thoroughgoing economic analyses of problems and solutions and his analyses of contingencies operating on politicians and reformers, as well as his views on conflicts in fundamental visions about human nature and the pivotal role of improvements in minority education.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology

Reference142 articles.

1. Adams L. M., Miller A. B. (2021). Minoritized groups: How well do the top clinical psychology journals represent this work? Clinical Psychological Science, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026211026979

2. Ambrosch G. (2019). Beware of the Trojan horse: A critique of social justice. Areo Magazine. https://areomagazine.com/2019/06/19/beware-of-the-trojan-horse-a-critique-of-social-justice/

3. American Psychological Association. (2017, February). APA continues its work to address poverty. Monitor on Psychology, 48(3). https://www.apa.org/monitor/2017/03/poverty.html

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3