Affiliation:
1. Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences (CASBS), Stanford University, and Center for Institutional Courage, Palo Alto, California
Abstract
In this commentary, I highlight flaws in the article by Woo and colleagues (this issue) that undermine its credibility and utility as rigorous science that contributes to the field. I do so by discussing (a) the concept of epistemic oppression regarding the glaring exclusion of multiple germane bodies of research and (b) the importance of including construct validity within a psychometric article regarding the Graduate Record Examination (GRE). I conclude with a plea to the authors that the matter of anti-Black violence and murder, which they reference, is one to be taken respectfully, seriously, and somberly.
Reference57 articles.
1. American Psychological Association CEMRRAT2 Task Force and Committee on Women in Psychology. (2017). Surviving and thriving in academia: A guide for members of marginalized groups. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/oema/resources/brochures/surviving.aspx
2. Meritocracy 2.0
3. Racial and ethnic imbalance in neuroscience reference lists and intersections with gender
4. Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation, Inc. (n.d). The Black lives matter movement. Retrieved on May 12, 2022, from https://blacklivesmatter.com/about/
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献