Affiliation:
1. University of North Carolina-Charlotte
Abstract
This article examines the extent to which different types of funders are asking nonprofit organizations for evaluation and performance measurement data, and describes the many ways in which nonprofit organizations are responding to these requests. The picture that emerges is one that is decidedly mixed, illustrating a range of behaviors that challenges the current perception that most, if not all, funders are asking nonprofit organizations for more evaluation and performance measurement data. The data collected during this study show that only those nonprofit organizations that receive considerable funding from the federal government and the United Way are engaging in program evaluation and performance measurement, compared to nonprofit organizations that receive more funding from state and local governments, foundations, and other sources. Furthermore, the extent to which nonprofit organizations are subjected to external monitoring and descriptive reporting requirements also varies according to the type and amount of funding.
Subject
Marketing,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference60 articles.
1. Averch, H.A. (2004). Using expert judgment. In J. S. Wholey, H. P. Hatry, & K. E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 282-309). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
2. Beam, D.R. & Conlan, T.J. (2002). Grants. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 340-380). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Contracted Services: Issues for the Nonprofit Agency Manager
Cited by
99 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献