Affiliation:
1. University of Melbourne and the Australia and New Zealand School of Government
2. Monash University and Australia and New Zealand School of Government
Abstract
New Public Management has now been “new” for more than 15 years, and public administration scholars are calling for new approaches, such as networked governance or collaboration. However, these approaches share with their predecessors the problem that they tend toward a one-best-way orientation. Instead, the authors argue, the next phase should be what they call “public value pragmatism.” In other words, the best management approach to adopt depends on the circumstances, such as the value being produced, the context, or the nature of the task. They illustrate a decision framework for determining the most appropriate approach for different types of circumstances. The emerging literature also tends to be unclear about the level of the public sector to which it applies. The authors distinguish three levels—programs, organizations, and whole public sectors—and put forward some propositions about how public value pragmatism might apply at each level.
Subject
Marketing,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference68 articles.
1. Alford, J. (1998). Corporate management. In J. Schafritz (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration (Vol. 1, pp. 538-539). Boulder, CO: Westview.
2. Performance Monitoring in the Australian Public Service: a Government-Wide Analysis
Cited by
282 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献