Affiliation:
1. School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Abstract
Over the coming decades, a large additional mass of plastic waste will become available for recycling, as efforts increase to reduce plastic pollution and facilitate a circular economy. New infrastructure will need to be developed, yet the processes and systems chosen should not result in adverse effects on human health and the environment. Here, we present a rapid review and critical semi-quantitative assessment of the potential risks posed by eight approaches to recovering value during the resource recovery phase from post-consumer plastic packaging waste collected and separated with the purported intention of recycling. The focus is on the Global South, where there are more chances that high risk processes could be run below standards of safe operation. Results indicate that under non-idealised operational conditions, mechanical reprocessing is the least impactful on the environment and therefore most appropriate for implementation in developing countries. Processes known as ‘chemical recycling’ are hard to assess due to lack of real-world process data. Given their lack of maturity and potential for risk to human health and the environment (handling of potentially hazardous substances under pressure and heat), it is unlikely they will make a useful addition to the circular economy in the Global South in the near future. Inevitably, increasing circular economy activity will require expansion towards targeting flexible, multi-material and multilayer products, for which mechanical recycling has well-established limitations. Our comparative risk overview indicates major barriers to changing resource recovery mode from the already dominant mechanical recycling mode towards other nascent or energetic recovery approaches.
Funder
Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid
Tearfund
Subject
Pollution,Environmental Engineering
Reference271 articles.
1. 60 Minutes Australia (2019) Exposing Australia’s recycling lie. Available at: https://youtu.be/lqrlEsPoyJk (accessed 28 June 2022).
2. Using waste plastic bottles as additive for stone mastic asphalt
3. Plastic Waste Management: A Review of Existing Life Cycle Assessment Studies
4. Aliño M, Moon D, Tangri N, et al. (2022) Chemical Recycling of Sachet Waste: A Failed Experiment. Berkeley, CA: Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives. Available at: https://www.no-burn.org/unilever-creasolv/.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献