A Novel Approach to Monitoring Cognitive Adverse Events for Interventional Studies Involving Advanced Dementia Patients: Insights From the Electroconvulsive Therapy for Agitation in Dementia Study

Author:

Park Soohyun12ORCID,Forester Brent P.12,Lapid Maria I.3,Harper David G.45,Hermida Adriana P.6,Inouye Sharon K.78,McClintock Shawn M.9,Nykamp Louis10,Petrides Georgios1112,Schmitt Eva M.7,Seiner Stephen J.13,Mueller Martina14,Patrick Regan E.45

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

2. Department of Psychiatry, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

3. Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

4. Geriatric Psychiatry Research Program, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA

5. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

6. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

7. Aging Brain Center, Hebrew Senior Life, Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA, USA

8. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA

9. Division of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

10. Pine Rest Christian Mental Health Services, Grand Rapids, MI, USA

11. Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA

12. Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA

13. Psychiatric Neurotherapeutics Program, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA

14. College of Nursing and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC, USA

Abstract

Objective To develop an individualized method for detecting cognitive adverse events (CAEs) in the context of an ongoing trial of electroconvulsive therapy for refractory agitation and aggression for advanced dementia (ECT-AD study). Methods Literature search aimed at identifying (a) cognitive measures appropriate for patients with advanced dementia, (b) functional scales to use as a proxy for cognitive status in patients with floor effects on baseline cognitive testing, and (c) statistical approaches for defining a CAE, to develop CAEs monitoring plan specifically for the ECT-AD study. Results Using the Severe Impairment Battery-8 (SIB-8), baseline floor effects are defined as a score of ≤5/16. For patients without floor effects, a decline of ≥6 points is considered a CAE. For patients with floor effects, a decline of ≥30 points from baseline on the Barthel Index is considered a CAE. These values were derived using the standard deviation index (SDI) approach to measuring reliable change. Conclusions The proposed plan accounts for practical and statistical challenges in detecting CAEs in patients with advanced dementia. While this protocol was developed in the context of the ECT-AD study, the general approach can potentially be applied to other interventional neuropsychiatric studies that carry the risk of CAEs in patients with advanced dementia.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

Hintz Family Foundation

Rogers Family Foundation

National Institute of Health

National Institute of Mental Health

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

NINR

NICHD

NHLBI

NIMHD

National Institute of Health/National Institute on Aging

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3