How Politics Shape Views Toward Fact-Checking: Evidence from Six European Countries

Author:

Lyons Ben1ORCID,Mérola Vittorio2,Reifler Jason3,Stoeckel Florian3

Affiliation:

1. The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

2. Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA

3. University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

Abstract

Fact-checking has spread internationally, in part to confront the rise of digital disinformation campaigns. American studies suggests ideological asymmetry in attitudes toward fact-checking, as well as greater acceptance of the practice among those more interested in and knowledgeable about politics. We examine attitudes toward fact-checking across six European counties to put these findings in a broader context ( N = 6,067). We find greater familiarity with and acceptance of fact-checking in Northern Europe (Sweden and Germany) than elsewhere (Italy, Spain, France, and Poland). We further find two dimensions of political antipathy: a left–right dimension and an “anti-elite” dimension (including dissatisfaction with democracy and negative feelings toward the European Union), the latter of which more consistently predicts negative feelings toward fact-checkers in the countries examined. Our findings demonstrate that despite general acceptance of the movement, significant political divides remain. Those less likely to trust fact-checkers could be more vulnerable to disinformation targeting these divides, leading to a spiral of cynicism.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Communication

Cited by 38 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Fact-checker warning labels are effective even for those who distrust fact-checkers;Nature Human Behaviour;2024-09-02

2. “We Follow the Disinformation”: Conceptualizing and Analyzing Fact-Checking Cultures Across Countries;The International Journal of Press/Politics;2024-08-11

3. Conspire to one's own detriment: Strengthening HPV Program Support Through Debunking Epistemically Suspect Beliefs;Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being;2024-06-24

4. Sober and Self-Guided Newsgathering;Media and Society After Technological Disruption;2024-05-31

5. Trusted Communicators;Media and Society After Technological Disruption;2024-05-31

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3