Field testing and numerical investigation of streetscape vehicular anti-ram barriers under vehicular impact using FEM-only and coupled FEM-SPH simulations

Author:

Yoo Tae Kwang1,Qiu Tong2,Reese Lynsey2,Rado Zoltan3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Acoustics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

3. The Thomas D. Larson Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

Abstract

This article presents two field-scale crash tests of Streetscape Vehicle Anti-Ram barrier systems and LS-DYNA simulations to predict the global response of each system under vehicular impact. Tests 1 and 2 consisted of a five-post welded bus stop and a welded bollard, respectively; both were in a steel and concrete composite foundation embedded in compacted American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials aggregate. Test 1 resulted in a P1 rating, where minimal foundation uplift and rotation were observed. Test 2 failed to result in a P1 rating, where significant foundation uplift, rotation, concrete cracking, and large deformation of surrounding soil were observed. For each test, two LS-DYNA models, namely, a finite element method–only model and a hybrid finite element method–smoothed particle hydrodynamics model, were created to predict the global response of the system. In the finite element method–only model, traditional finite element method approach was used for the entire soil region; in the hybrid finite element method–smoothed particle hydrodynamics model, the near-field soil region was modeled using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach, whereas the far-field soil region was modeled using the finite element method approach. For Test 1, both the finite element method–only model and the hybrid finite element method–smoothed particle hydrodynamics model were able to match the recorded global response of the system. For Test 2, however, the finite element method–only approach was not able to accurately predict the global response of the system; on the other hand, the hybrid finite element method–smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach was able to capture the global response including the bollard pullout, soil upheaval, and vehicle override. This research suggests that the hybrid finite element method–smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach is more appropriate in simulating the field performance of embedded structures under impact loading when large deformation of the surrounding soil is expected.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanics of Materials,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Building and Construction

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3