Large vessel occlusion prediction scale thresholds that are sensitive for DAWN Trial patients

Author:

Keenan Kevin J1ORCID,Smith Wade S2,Jadhav Ashutosh P3,Haussen Diogo C4,Budzik Ronald F5,Bonafé Alain6,Bhuva Parita7,Yavagal Dileep R8,Ribò Marc910,Cognard Christophe11ORCID,Hanel Ricardo A12,Hassan Ameer E13ORCID,Sila Cathy A14,Saver Jeffrey L15,Liebeskind David S15ORCID,Jovin Tudor G16,Nogueira Raul G17

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA

2. Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

3. Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA

4. Department of Neurology and Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine at Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA

5. Department of Radiology, OhioHealth/Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA

6. Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Montpellier, Hop Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France

7. Texas Stroke Institute at HCA North Texas, Plano, TX, USA

8. Department of Neurology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA

9. Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain

10. Department of Neurology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Stroke Unit, Barcelona, Spain

11. Department of Neuroradiology, Hospital Purpan, Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées, France

12. Baptist Medical Center Jacksonville/Lyerly Neurosurgery, Jacksonville, FL, USA

13. Department of Neurology, Valley Baptist Medical Center - Harlingen, TX, USA

14. University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

15. Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

16. Cooper Hospital University Medical Center, Camden, NJ, USA

17. Department of Neurology, UPMC Stroke Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Abstract

Background Large vessel occlusion (LVO) prediction scales are used to triage prehospital suspected stroke patients with a high probability of LVO stroke to endovascular therapy centers. The sensitivities of these scales in the 6-to-24-h time window are unknown. Higher scale score thresholds are typically less sensitive and more specific. Knowing the highest scale score thresholds that remain sensitive could inform threshold selection for clinical use. Sensitivities may also vary between left and right-sided LVOs. Methods LVO prediction scale scores were retrospectively calculated using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of patients enrolled in the DAWN Trial. All patients had last known well times between 6 and 24 h, NIHSS scores ≥ 10, intracranial internal carotid artery or proximal middle cerebral artery occlusions, and mismatches between their clinical severities and infarct core volumes. Scale thresholds with sensitivities ≥ 85% were identified, along with scores ≥ 5% more sensitive for left or right-sided LVOs. Specificities could not be calculated because all patients had LVOs. Results A total of 201 out of 206 patients had the required NIHSS subitem scores. CPSS = 3, C-STAT ≥ 2, FAST-ED ≥ 4, G-FAST ≥ 3, RACE ≥ 5, and SAVE ≥ 3 were the highest thresholds that were still 85% sensitive for DAWN Trial LVO stroke patients. RACE ≥ 5 was the only typically used score threshold more sensitive for right-sided LVOs, though similar small differences were seen for other scales at higher thresholds. Conclusions Our findings likely represent the maximum sensitivities of the LVO prediction scales tested for ideal thrombectomy candidates in the 6-to-24-h time window because NIHSS scores were documented in hospitals during a clinical trial rather than in the prehospital setting. Patients with NIHSS scores < 10 or more distal LVOs would lower sensitivities further. Selecting even higher scale thresholds for LVO triage would lead to many missed LVO strokes.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3