Usefulness of silent magnetic resonance angiography for intracranial aneurysms treated with a flow re-direction endoluminal device

Author:

Suzuki Tomoaki1ORCID,Hasegawa Hitoshi1,Okamoto Kouichirou2ORCID,Ando Kazuhiro1,Shibuya Kouhei1,Takahashi Haruhiko1,Saito Shoji1ORCID,Fujiwara Hidemoto1ORCID,Oishi Makoto1,Fujii Yukihiko1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan

2. Department of Translational Research, Brain Research Institute, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan

Abstract

Purpose Flow re-direction endoluminal device (FRED) is a novel dual-layer flow-diverting stent to treat cerebral aneurysms with high obliteration rates, however, it induces inevitable metal-related artifacts. We compared silent magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), a new MRA method using ultra-short time of echo and arterial spin-labeling, with conventional time-of-flight (TOF)-MRA for imaging aneurysms treated using FRED. Methods Between May 2020 and September 2022, 16 patients with unruptured internal carotid aneurysms treated using FRED simultaneously underwent silent MRA and TOF-MRA after treatment, with 36 follow-up sessions in total. Two observers independently graded the quality of intra-aneurysmal flow and stented parent arteries under both types of MRA from 1 (not visible) to 4 (nearly equal to digital subtraction angiography [DSA]), with reference to DSA images as a standard criterion. Results The mean scores for intra-aneurysmal flow and stented parent arteries were significantly better for silent MRA (3.93  ±  0.21 and 3.82  ±  0.32, respectively) than for TOF-MRA (2.08  ±  0.99 and 1.92  ±  0.79, respectively) ( P < 0.01). Intermodality agreements for intra-aneurysmal flow and stented parent arteries were 0.87 and 0.90, respectively. Conclusion Silent MRA is superior to TOF-MRA for assessing patients treated with FRED, with potential as an alternative imaging modality to DSA.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Immunology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3