Smaller diameter sheaths are required to safely perform transradial neurointerventions

Abstract

We read with great interest the paper titled “Transradial access with Simmons guiding catheter for carotid artery stenting: Feasibility and procedural complications in a single-center experience” by Muszynski et al. The authors concluded that a transradial carotid artery stenting (CAS) using a Glidesheath Slender 7F Introducer/7F Envoy Simmons 2 catheter system was feasible with a high procedural success rate and low access site complication rate. We completely agree with their conclusions. In this study, large-diameter sheaths were used. Large sheaths increase the risk of developing radial artery spasms. Interventionalists must be aware that radial artery spasm can not only require an access crossover, but can also cause severe access site complications, such as eversion or avulsion of the radial artery, catheter/sheath entrapment, and compartment syndrome. A 6F Simmons guiding sheath has a smaller outer diameter than the Glidesheath Slender 7F Introducer does, and it offers a large-bore working channel compatible with a 10-mm diameter Wallstent and Acculink. Transradial CAS with a 6F Simmons guiding sheath has previously yielded a high procedural success rate without serious access site complications. Nevertheless, we believe that a further decrease in the sheath diameter is required to safely perform transradial neurointerventions in more patients.