Analysis of endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery compared to other anatomical locations

Author:

Murias Quintana Eduardo1,Vega Valdés Pedro1,Morales Deza Edison1,Gil Garcia Alberto2,Cuellar Hugo3,Costilla García Serafín1,Cadenas Rodríguez María4,Delgado Montserrat Gonzalez5,Peña Suárez Jorge6,Santamarta Liébana Elena6,López-García Antonio7

Affiliation:

1. Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Radiology – Interventional Neuroradiology, Spain

2. Hospital Universitario de Cruces – Bilbao, Radiology – Interventional Neuroradiology, Spain

3. Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Neurosurgery, USA

4. Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Medical Nursing, Spain

5. Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Neurology, Spain

6. Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Radiology, Spain

7. Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Neurosurgery, Spain

Abstract

Objective The objective of this article is to compare the results of endovascular treatment of ruptured middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms with ruptured aneurysms of other anatomic locations. Methods Fifty consecutive ruptured aneurysms of the MCA and 209 aneurysms at other anatomical locations were selected retrospectively. We compared epidemiological, clinical and radiological variables, prognosis and complications. Results The MCA aneurysms had a greater size and a poor dome/neck ratio. There were no significant differences in endovascular technique complications, occlusion rate or rebleeding between the two groups ( p > 0.1). There were no significant differences in the mortality and number of dependent patients after one month. Conclusion The endovascular treatment of ruptured MCA aneurysms without hematoma is as safe and effective as other aneurysm localizations. Complication rates, occlusion rates and rebleeding of ruptured MCA aneurysms are comparable to other locations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Immunology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3