The impact of delivery technique on Woven EndoBridge deployment and detachment in an in vitro aneurysm model

Author:

Essibayi Muhammed Amir1ORCID,Altschul David J.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurological Surgery and Montefiore-Einstein Cerebrovascular Research Lab, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

Abstract

Background The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is increasingly used for treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. With the newer 17 system, WEB deployment has been associated with a phenomenon known as incomplete or “sticky” detachment from the delivery wire, which may lead to imprecise placement. Optimal techniques for WEB manipulation and delivery to avoid this problem are poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate standard WEB deployment techniques and determine the impact of delivery techniques and WEB stickiness on procedural success. Methods An in vitro study using identical silicone middle cerebral artery aneurysm models ( n = 32) assessed WEB (6 × 2 mm) deployment through a VIA 17 microcatheter via three techniques that involved: “loading,” “neutral,” and “tension” on the pusher wire. Microcatheter position was placed in varied positions from the WEB device. Woven EndoBridge stickiness was graded during detachment attempts. Primary outcomes were detachment stickiness and attempt number, compared between techniques using Fisher's exact test. Results The tension technique resulted in significantly fewer sticky detachments and detachment attempts compared to forward load or neutral techniques (p < 0.001). Sticky detachment was lower with tension (0% sticky) versus forward load (42% sticky, 8% very sticky) (p < 0.001). Forward load had a 50% rate of stickiness versus 0% with tension and neutral (p < 0.001). Forward load required multiple attempts in 100%, compared to 57% with neutral and 8% with tension (p < 0.001). Higher stickiness grades increased the need for multiple attempts (p < 0.001). Conclusion The tension technique reduces incomplete WEB detachment and enables precise single-attempt detachment, optimizing delivery precision. In vivo confirmation is needed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3