Affiliation:
1. Department of Management and Marketing, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
Abstract
Prior research stresses the importance of consumer participation in service coproduction. We examine the coproduction of aesthetic services, which are services in which beauty is a critical outcome. Consumers face challenges communicating their aesthetic tastes because of technical constraints that are understood by service providers but that consumers do not fully understand. To fill this gap, consumers do aesthetic work in communities of practice. Service providers also face challenges, as they must coproduce with consumers whose aesthetic tastes are formed amid shifting social standards. In this qualitative study, we highlight aesthetic work as a different type of consumer work that involves developing cultural competence. We identify four types of aesthetic coproduction in which cultural competence is distributed differently within the service dyad: aesthetic codesigning, aesthetic consenting, aesthetic yielding, and aesthetic reigning. We explore the managerial implications that arise as consumers increasingly use online social resources that shape and increase aesthetic expectations. We examine the unintended consequences of aesthetic service coproduction in which providers’ technical and aesthetic expertise is difficult for consumers to understand often leading to disappointing outcomes.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Sociology and Political Science,Information Systems
Reference63 articles.
1. The Aesthetic Society (2019), “Aesthetic Plastic Surgery National Databank Statistics 2019,” [available at https://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/Aesthetic- Society_Stats2019Book_FINAL.pdf].
2. Anderson Laurel, Spanjol Jelena, Go Jefferies Josephine, Ostrom Amy L., Baker Courtney Nations, Bone Sterling A., Downey Hilary, Mende Martin, Rapp Justine M (2016), “Responsibility and Well-Being: Resource Integration under Responsibilization in Expert Services,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 35 (2), 262-279.
3. Anderson Stephanie, Hamilton Kathy, Tonner Andrea (2016), “Social Labour: Exploring Work in Consumption,” Marketing Theory, 16 (3), 383-400.
4. Arsel Zeynep, Bean Jonathan (2013), “Taste Regimes and Market-Mediated Practice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (5), 899-917.
5. Auh Seigyoung, Bell Simon J., McLeod Colin S., Shih Eric (2007), “Co-Production and Customer Loyalty in Financial Services,” Journal of Retailing, 83 (3), 359-370.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献