Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast: analysis of diagnostic tools in a registry-based population

Author:

Salminen Samuli Henri1ORCID,Sampo Mika M2,Böhling Tom O3,Salo Juho4ORCID,Tarkkanen Maija1,Blomqvist Carl P15,Hukkinen Katja6

Affiliation:

1. Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

2. Department of Pathology, HUSLAB Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

3. Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

4. Department of Plastic Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

5. Department of Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden

6. HUH Medical Imaging Center, Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

Background Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast (RAASB) is a serious late consequence caused by breast cancer treatment. Initial symptoms are often inconspicuous, thus contributing to diagnostic delay. Most previous studies of the diagnostic aspects of RAASB are case reports. Purpose To perform a complete review of the imaging findings and biopsy methods in a nationwide RAASB cohort. Material and Methods RAASB patients were identified from a national cancer registry and additional patients were included from our hospital. All available information from imaging (mammogram [MGR], ultrasound [US], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and computed tomography [CT]) and biopsies was reviewed. The sensitivity of imaging and biopsy methods for detection of RAASB was calculated. Results Fifty-eight patients with RAASB were found. Fourteen MGR, 30 US, 24 MRI, and 25 CT studies were available for evaluation. The sensitivity of MGR, US, MRI, and CT for detection of RAASB was 43%, 50%, 92%, and 84%, respectively. Superior sensitivity was demonstrated for punch biopsy (84%) and incisional biopsy (93%) compared to fine-needle aspiration cytology (0%) and core needle biopsy (18%). Conclusion MRI and CT have comparable sensitivity for detection of RAASB, while MGR and US are unreliable. However, negative findings in MRI or CT must be interpreted with caution. Punch biopsy and incisional biopsy are the preferred biopsy methods.

Funder

Competitive Research Funding of Helsinki University Hospital

Finnish Society for Oncology

Syöpäjärjestöt

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3