A metric for quantitative evaluation of glioma margin changes in magnetic resonance imaging

Author:

Hu Binwu1,Zhang Zhiqiang2,Chen Suting1ORCID,Xu Qiang2,Li Jianrui2

Affiliation:

1. School of Electronics & Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, PR China

2. Department of Medical Imaging, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, PR China

Abstract

Background Gliomas differ from meningiomas in their margins, most of which are not separated from the surrounding tissue by a distinct interface. Purpose To characterize the margins of gliomas quantitatively based on the margin sharpness coefficient (MSC) is significant for clinical judgment and invasive analysis of gliomas. Material and Methods The data for this study used magnetic resonance image (MRI) data from 67 local patients and 15 open patients to quantify the intensity of changes in the glioma margins of the brain using MSC. The accuracy of MSC was assessed by consistency analysis and Bland–Altman test analysis, as well as invasive correlations using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Spearman correlation coefficients for subjects. Results In grading the tumors, the mean MSC values were significantly lower for high-grade gliomas (HGG) than for low-grade gliomas (LGG). The concordance correlation between the measured gradient and the actual gradient was high (HGG: 0.981; LGG: 0.993), and the Bland–Altman mean difference at the 95% confidence interval (HGG: −0.576; LGG: 0.254) and the limits of concordance (HGG: 5.580; LGG: 5.436) indicated no statistical difference. The correlation between MSC and invasion based on the margins of gliomas showed an AUC of 0.903 and 0.911 for HGG and LGG, respectively. The mean Spearman correlation coefficient of the MSC versus the actual distance of invasion was −0.631 in gliomas. Conclusion The relatively low MSC on the blurred margins and irregular shape of gliomas may help in benign-malignant differentiation and invasion prediction of gliomas and has potential application for clinical judgment.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3