Generative adversarial network-based post-processed image super-resolution technology for accelerating brain MRI: comparison with compressed sensing

Author:

Ueki Wataru1ORCID,Nishii Tatsuya1ORCID,Umehara Kensuke234,Ota Junko234,Higuchi Satoshi1,Ohta Yasutoshi1ORCID,Nagai Yasuhiro1,Murakawa Keizo1,Ishida Takayuki4,Fukuda Tetsuya1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan

2. Medical Informatics Section, QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan

3. Applied MRI Research, Department of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan

4. Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan

Abstract

Background It is unclear whether deep-learning–based super-resolution technology (SR) or compressed sensing technology (CS) can accelerate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) . Purpose To compare SR accelerated images with CS images regarding the image similarity to reference 2D- and 3D gradient-echo sequence (GRE) brain MRI. Material and Methods We prospectively acquired 1.3× and 2.0× faster 2D and 3D GRE images of 20 volunteers from the reference time by reducing the matrix size or increasing the CS factor. For SR, we trained the generative adversarial network (GAN), upscaling the low-resolution images to the reference images with twofold cross-validation. We compared the structural similarity (SSIM) index of accelerated images to the reference image. The rate of incorrect answers of a radiologist discriminating faster and reference image was used as a subjective image similarity (ISM) index. Results The SR demonstrated significantly higher SSIM than the CS (SSIM=0.9993–0.999 vs. 0.9947–0.9986; P < 0.001). In 2D GRE, it was challenging to discriminate the SR image from the reference image, compared to the CS (ISM index 40% vs. 17.5% in 1.3×; P = 0.039 and 17.5% vs. 2.5% in 2.0×; P = 0.034). In 3D GRE, the CS revealed a significantly higher ISM index than the SR (22.5% vs. 2.5%; P = 0.011) in 2.0 × faster images. However, the ISM index was identical for the 2.0× CS and 1.3× SR (22.5% vs. 27.5%; P = 0.62) with comparable time costs. Conclusion The GAN-based SR outperformed CS in image similarity with 2D GRE for MRI acceleration. In addition, CS was more advantageous in 3D GRE than SR.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3